According to CC 27, when can an officer use force?

The correct answer is that an officer can use as much force as is reasonably necessary to prevent an offense. This principle emphasizes that the use of force must be proportional to the situation at hand. Law enforcement officers are trained to assess the circumstances and determine the appropriate level of force required to effectively prevent a crime while ensuring public safety. This approach is aimed at minimizing harm and ensuring that actions taken are justified based on the potential threat or risk posed by the situation.

The concept of "reasonably necessary" acknowledges that not all situations warrant a physical response, and the officer's actions should reflect a balance between authority and restraint. This means that officers must remain vigilant in ensuring that their use of force aligns with the legal standards and the expectations of their duties, using only what is essential to address the immediate threat or crime.

Options suggesting that force can be used solely when an officer is threatened or indiscriminately with no limits might lead to excessive use of force, which is not supported by law and policy standards. Furthermore, the idea of using force while capturing a fleeing suspect also requires careful consideration of the context and threat level, reiterating that force should not be used lightly or without justification.